Judge Rules 9/11 was a Conspiracy After Seeing Evidence

SUBSCRIBE: http://bit.ly/shakaama2
MY TWITTER: https://twitter.com/Kevin_Cardinale
MY FACEBOOK: http://www.facebook.com/kevin.cardinale.1
http://www.lasvegasnevadadui.com/
MY BLOG: http://shakaama.blogspot.com/
MY PINTEREST: http://www.pinterest.com/shakaama/

Judge Rules 9/11 was a Conspiracy After Seeing Evidence

Tony Rooke refused to pay a TV license fee because the BBC intentionally misrepresented facts about the 9/11 attacks, he alleged. It is widely known that the BBC reported the collapse of World

Trade Center Building 7 over 20 minutes before it occurred. WTC 7 was a 47-story skyscraper that was not hit by a plane on 9/11 but collapsed at free-fall speed later that day.

So Rooke said the BBC had to have had prior knowledge to a terror attack making them complicit in the attack. He presented the BBC footage to the judge along with a slew of other evidence, and the judge agreed that Rooke had a reasonable case to protest. Rooke was found not guilty and he was not fined for failure to pay the licensing fee.

Leave A Reply