Global Warming Propaganda Explained – Lord Christopher Monckton 2014 NIPCC Convention

In this video, Lord Christopher Monckton explains in detail the many various methologies of the globaling warming propaganda, the hoax and fear mongering government uses to trick the public into believing the lies, and how they manipulate the data for to meet their agenda.

The IPCC is made up of 72 people… The NIPCC who dissent from the IPCC, 32,000 scientists and climate change analysts oppose the political agenda created for the purpose of expanding regulations and power of the government, subsequently increasing taxes at every direction, to expand government further, around the world.

Why? It’s simple…. Karl Marx, 1848, when he created the concept of progressivism,,, “to transfer wealth and power to the state”…….. sums that up.

NIPCC (Non Government International Panel on Climate Change

Video Credit, Heartland Foundation, via 9th International Conference on Climate Change

———————-

H.G. Wells was of the greatest influences on the progressive mind in the twentieth century (and, it turns out, the inspiration for Huxley’s Brave New World). Wells didn’t coin the phrase as an indictment, but as a badge of honor. Progressives must become “liberal fascists” and “enlightened Nazis,” he told the Young Liberals at Oxford in a speech in July 1932.

This is why the fake liberals of today call themselves “liberal”. They hijacked the word after progressive was tainted with Hitler, Eugenics, population control, economic fascism, etc.

“The “progressives” who today masquerade as “liberals” may rant against “fascism”; yet it is their policy that paves the way for Hitlerism.” said classical liberal Ludwig von Mises 1940

In a laudatory review of Roosevelt’s 1933 book Looking Forward, Mussolini wrote, “Reminiscent of Fascism is the principle that the state no longer leaves the economy to its own devices…. Without question, the mood accompanying this sea change resembles that of Fascism.”

Where socialism sought totalitarian control of a society’s economic processes through direct state operation of the means of production, fascism sought that control indirectly, through domination of nominally private owners. Where socialism nationalized property explicitly, fascism did so implicitly, by requiring owners to use their property in the “national interest”—that is, as the autocratic authority conceived it. (Nevertheless, a few industries were operated by the state.) Where socialism abolished all market relations outright, fascism left the appearance of market relations while planning all economic activities. Where socialism abolished money and prices, fascism controlled the monetary system and set all prices and wages politically. In doing all this, fascism denatured the marketplace. Entrepreneurship was abolished. State ministries, rather than consumers, determined what was produced and under what conditions.

Fascists seek to unify their nation through a totalitarian state that promotes the mass mobilization of the national community.

Karl Marx, Progressivism, “to transfer wealth and power to the state”

Regulate: Control or supervise (something, esp. a company or business activity) by means of rules and regulations.

Totalitarianism: A political system in which the state holds total authority over the society and seeks to control all aspects of public and private life whenever necessary

Subjugation is one of many types of injustice in the world. It has to do with one group of people dominating another group by taking away their freedom.

Leave A Reply